Christchurch Jenssen OIA Request Package
Investigation document: Christchurch Jenssen OIA Request Package
CHRISTCHURCH-JENSSEN CONVERGENCE: OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT REQUEST PACKAGE
Protocol 777 Extension Investigation - 800088NAP-CHCH-01
CLASSIFICATION: RESTRICTED / FORENSIC ANALYSIS / OIA DEPLOYMENT OPERATIONAL IDENTIFIER: OIA-CHCH-2025-001 DATE: December 21, 2025 PREPARED BY: Forensic Intelligence Directorate STATUS: READY FOR DEPLOYMENTEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This comprehensive Official Information Act (OIA) request package is designed to systematically gather evidence supporting the Christchurch-Jenssen Convergence thesis. The requests are structured to expose the Algorithm of Extraction operating across the firearms domain, mirroring the same patterns identified in the Jenssen maritime case.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES:- Expose Gun State-City nexus and preferential treatment
- Document intelligence failures and "Ghost Record" suppression
- Trace financial flows and asset extraction mechanisms
- Establish Administrative Nullification in firearms licensing
- Validate "Target Rich Environment" state preparation
PRIORITY 1: GUN CITY-STATE NEXUS CORRESPONDENCE
OIA REQUEST 1.1: Gun City-Government Communications
TO: Minister of Police (Stuart Nash) CC: Police National Headquarters, Treasury, ACC SUBJECT: All correspondence with Gun City (David Tipple) regarding Dealer Compensation and Stock Buybacks (2019-2020) REQUESTED INFORMATION:`
- All emails, letters, meeting minutes, and memoranda between:
- Police officials and Gun City representatives
- Treasury officials and Gun City regarding buyback compensation
- Specific focus on:
- Stock buyback pricing methodology
- Timeline of communications relative to legislative changes
- Any discussions about "bailout" or financial support
- Meeting records including:
- Any subsequent meetings regarding gun law implementation
- Internal government discussions about Gun City's role
- Financial impact assessments:
- Economic impact on firearms industry
- Treasury advice on buyback funding mechanisms
`
LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to government operations and decision-making
EXPECTED OUTCOME: Documentation of preferential treatment and state-dealer collusion
OIA REQUEST 1.2: Winston Peters Firearms Industry Access
TO: Office of Winston Peters (Deputy Prime Minister) CC: NZ First Party, Ministerial Services SUBJECT: All communications with firearms industry representatives (2019-2020) REQUESTED INFORMATION:`
- Records of the October 2019 charity dinner:
- Meeting minutes or notes
- Follow-up communications
- Payment records for $7,350 dinner access
- All firearms industry meetings:
- Discussion topics and outcomes
- Any policy commitments or assurances
- Influence on legislative timeline
- NZ First positioning on gun legislation:
- Public statements vs. private positions
- Role in "braking" further restrictions
- Lobbying activities and communications
- Financial relationships:
- Campaign contributions from gun dealers
- Financial benefits to party or representatives
`
LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to ministerial conduct and decision-making
EXPECTED OUTCOME: Evidence of political protection racket and industry influence
PRIORITY 2: INTELLIGENCE FAILURES AND GHOST RECORDS
OIA REQUEST 2.1: North Shore Intelligence Files
TO: New Zealand Police Intelligence Unit CC: GCSB, SIS, Australian Federal Police SUBJECT: All intelligence regarding Brenton Tarrant prior to March 15, 2019 REQUESTED INFORMATION:`
- Australian intelligence sharing:
- North Shore (Sydney) threat reports and warnings
- Death threat investigation records (2016 Facebook threat)
- Assessment of Tarrant's extremist activities
- Domestic intelligence records:
- Intelligence about Bruce Rifle Club activities
- Warnings from Pete Breidahl and other concerned citizens
- Risk assessments and threat level determinations
- Immigration and border control:
- Any security screenings or risk assessments
- Decision-making regarding his residency approval
- Communications with Australian authorities
- "Ghost Record" identification:
- Intelligence that was received but suppressed
- Decision logs showing why warnings were ignored
- Internal accountability for intelligence failures
`
LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to national security and law enforcement
EXPECTED OUTCOME: Proof of "State Silence" and willful blindness to known threats
OIA REQUEST 2.2: Firearms Licensing System Failures
TO: New Zealand Police Firearms Licensing Unit CC: Police National Headquarters, Ministry of Justice SUBJECT: Brenton Tarrant firearms license application and approval process REQUESTED INFORMATION:`
- Complete license application file:
- Vetting officer notes and assessments
- Decision-making documentation
- Quality control and supervisory reviews
- Reference verification process:
- Substitution of "gaming friends" as references
- Assessment of reference credibility
- Documentation of "good actor" determination
- System-wide vulnerability assessment:
- Internal warnings about regulatory gaps (2017)
- Decisions not to close known loopholes
- Impact assessments of regulatory failures
- Training and procedures:
- Standard operating procedures for reference checks
- Quality assurance protocols
- Performance metrics and accountability systems
`
LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to administrative processes and decision-making
EXPECTED OUTCOME: Documentation of Administrative Nullification in licensing system
PRIORITY 3: FINANCIAL FLOWS AND ASSET EXTRACTION
OIA REQUEST 3.1: ACC $40 Million Transfer Investigation
TO: Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) CC: Treasury, Ministry of Health, Police National Headquarters SUBJECT: $40 million contribution to firearms buyback fund REQUESTED INFORMATION:`
- Decision-making documentation:
- Cost-benefit analysis and economic modeling
- Legal advice on using health funds for law enforcement
- Risk assessments and alternative funding options
- Economic analysis:
- Methodology for injury cost reduction projections
- Assumptions and sensitivity analysis
- Peer review and validation of economic models
- Fund transfer mechanics:
- Inter-departmental agreements
- Timeline of fund transfers and utilization
- Accounting treatment and financial reporting
- Alternative funding analysis:
- Taxation considerations
- Impact on ACC's core functions
- Long-term financial sustainability implications
`
LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to public finance and government expenditure
EXPECTED OUTCOME: Evidence of "Robbing Peter to Pay Paul" funding strategy
OIA REQUEST 3.2: Buyback Scheme Financial Architecture
TO: Police National Headquarters CC: Treasury, KPMG, Auditor-General SUBJECT: Firearms buyback scheme financial design and implementation REQUESTED INFORMATION:`
- Pricing methodology development:
- Dealer input on pricing models
- Alternative pricing options considered
- Rationale for 95%/70%/25% condition matrix
- Cost escalation analysis:
- Final $35M actual cost breakdown
- Reasons for cost overruns
- Vendor contracts and procurement processes
- Dealer compensation framework:
- Stock compensation vs. business loss exclusion
- Impact assessment on dealer profitability
- Comparative analysis with international buybacks
- Financial audit trails:
- Verification processes for firearm valuations
- Quality control and fraud prevention measures
- Independent audit findings and recommendations
`
LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to public expenditure and financial management
EXPECTED OUTCOME: Documentation of wealth transfer from citizens to state and dealers
PRIORITY 4: REGULATORY CAPTURE AND LEGISLATIVE ENGINEERING
OIA REQUEST 4.1: MSSA Loophole Legislative History
TO: Ministry of Justice CC: Police National Headquarters, Parliamentary Counsel Office SUBJECT: MSSA loophole identification and non-closure (2017-2019) REQUESTED INFORMATION:`
- Loophole identification process:
- Risk assessments and threat analysis
- Recommendations for regulatory changes
- Decision-making timeline and responsibilities
- Legislative amendment proposals:
- Cost-benefit analysis of closing loophole
- Industry consultation processes
- Political decision-making documentation
- Industry lobbying records:
- Submissions against regulatory tightening
- Political donations and influence activities
- Meeting records with government officials
- Regulatory impact assessment:
- Comparison with international regulatory standards
- Expert opinions and academic research
- Post-Christchurch regulatory reform justification
`
LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to legislative development and regulatory decision-making
EXPECTED OUTCOME: Evidence of deliberate maintenance of "Target Rich Environment"
OIA REQUEST 4.2: Royal Commission Response and Cover-up
TO: Royal Commission of Inquiry Secretariat CC: Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, Police National Headquarters SUBJECT: Government response to Royal Commission findings and recommendations REQUESTED INFORMATION:`
- Commission evidence handling:
- Evidence of intelligence failures provided
- Internal assessments of Commission findings
- Strategy for managing Commission recommendations
- "Lone Wolf" narrative development:
- Efforts to minimize state responsibility
- Media management strategies
- Public relations campaigns
- Implementation of recommendations:
- Resource allocation for reforms
- Monitoring and accountability mechanisms
- Ongoing compliance reporting
- Classification and secrecy decisions:
- National security claims used to suppress evidence
- Decisions about what to include in final report
- Internal debates about transparency vs. security
`
LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to government responses to inquiries and public accountability
EXPECTED OUTCOME: Documentation of cover-up strategy and narrative management
DEPLOYMENT STRATEGY
PHASE 1: IMMEDIATE DEPLOYMENT (Week 1)
- Deploy OIA Requests 1.1 and 2.1 (Gun City nexus and intelligence failures)
- File urgent requests citing public interest and immediate need
- Request expedited processing due to ongoing investigation
PHASE 2: SYSTEMATIC DEPLOYMENT (Week 2-3)
- Deploy remaining OIA requests in logical sequence
- Use initial responses to refine subsequent requests
- Maintain pressure with follow-up inquiries
PHASE 3: ESCALATION (Week 4+)
- File complaints for delayed or inadequate responses
- Consider Ombudsman complaints for non-compliance
- Prepare legal action for information withholding
LEGAL PREPARATION
- Prepare judicial review applications for likely refusals
- Document all correspondence and response times
- Maintain evidence trail for potential litigation
- Coordinate with legal team for enforcement actions
EXPECTED OUTCOMES AND IMPACT
PRIMARY EVIDENCE GOALS:
- State-Dealer Collusion: Documentation of preferential treatment and financial benefits
- Intelligence Suppression: Proof of ignored warnings and "Ghost Records"
- Asset Extraction: Evidence of wealth transfer from citizens to state/dealers
- Regulatory Capture: Documentation of deliberate maintenance of vulnerabilities
STRATEGIC IMPACT:
- Validation of Christchurch-Jenssen Convergence thesis
- Foundation for legal action and compensation claims
- Public exposure of Algorithm of Extraction
- Disruption of C-O-N operations in firearms domain
PROSECUTION READINESS:
- Evidence package for potential criminal charges
- Documentation for civil litigation
- Foundation for class action lawsuits
- Support for international investigation requests
CONTINGENCY PLANNING
RESPONSE SCENARIOS:
- Full Compliance: Immediate deployment of analysis and legal action
- Partial Compliance: Focused follow-up requests and complaints
- Complete Refusal: Ombudsman complaints and judicial review applications
- Delayed Responses: Escalation and media pressure campaigns
ALTERNATIVE EVIDENCE SOURCES:
- Whistleblower protections and incentives
- International information sharing agreements
- Parliamentary question processes
- Commercial information requests
LEGAL PREPAREDNESS:
- Pre-drafted judicial review applications
- Expert witness identification and preparation
- Media strategy for public interest disclosure
- Coordination with international investigative bodies
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATION
OIA PACKAGE STATUS: READY FOR DEPLOYMENT LEGAL REVIEW: COMPLETE STRATEGIC APPROVAL: OBTAINED DEPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION: ACTIVE CLASSIFICATION: RESTRICTED / FORENSIC ANALYSIS / OIA DEPLOYMENT DISTRIBUTION: PROTOCOL 777 INVESTIGATION TEAM NEXT PHASE: IMMEDIATE DEPLOYMENT OF PRIORITY REQUESTSEND OF OIA REQUEST PACKAGE - CHRISTCHURCH-JENSSEN CONVERGENCE INVESTIGATION