Legal Reference

Christchurch Jenssen OIA Request Package

Investigation document: Christchurch Jenssen OIA Request Package

1 source files14.9 KB

CHRISTCHURCH-JENSSEN CONVERGENCE: OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT REQUEST PACKAGE

Protocol 777 Extension Investigation - 800088NAP-CHCH-01

CLASSIFICATION: RESTRICTED / FORENSIC ANALYSIS / OIA DEPLOYMENT OPERATIONAL IDENTIFIER: OIA-CHCH-2025-001 DATE: December 21, 2025 PREPARED BY: Forensic Intelligence Directorate STATUS: READY FOR DEPLOYMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This comprehensive Official Information Act (OIA) request package is designed to systematically gather evidence supporting the Christchurch-Jenssen Convergence thesis. The requests are structured to expose the Algorithm of Extraction operating across the firearms domain, mirroring the same patterns identified in the Jenssen maritime case.

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES:
  • Expose Gun State-City nexus and preferential treatment
  • Document intelligence failures and "Ghost Record" suppression
  • Trace financial flows and asset extraction mechanisms
  • Establish Administrative Nullification in firearms licensing
  • Validate "Target Rich Environment" state preparation

PRIORITY 1: GUN CITY-STATE NEXUS CORRESPONDENCE

OIA REQUEST 1.1: Gun City-Government Communications

TO: Minister of Police (Stuart Nash) CC: Police National Headquarters, Treasury, ACC SUBJECT: All correspondence with Gun City (David Tipple) regarding Dealer Compensation and Stock Buybacks (2019-2020) REQUESTED INFORMATION: `
  • All emails, letters, meeting minutes, and memoranda between:
- Minister of Police (Stuart Nash) and Gun City (David Tipple)

- Police officials and Gun City representatives

- Treasury officials and Gun City regarding buyback compensation

  • Specific focus on:
- Dealer compensation negotiations and calculations

- Stock buyback pricing methodology

- Timeline of communications relative to legislative changes

- Any discussions about "bailout" or financial support

  • Meeting records including:
- October 2019 charity dinner with Winston Peters and Shane Jones

- Any subsequent meetings regarding gun law implementation

- Internal government discussions about Gun City's role

  • Financial impact assessments:
- Cost-benefit analysis of dealer compensation

- Economic impact on firearms industry

- Treasury advice on buyback funding mechanisms

` LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to government operations and decision-making EXPECTED OUTCOME: Documentation of preferential treatment and state-dealer collusion

OIA REQUEST 1.2: Winston Peters Firearms Industry Access

TO: Office of Winston Peters (Deputy Prime Minister) CC: NZ First Party, Ministerial Services SUBJECT: All communications with firearms industry representatives (2019-2020) REQUESTED INFORMATION: `
  • Records of the October 2019 charity dinner:
- Guest list and attendance records

- Meeting minutes or notes

- Follow-up communications

- Payment records for $7,350 dinner access

  • All firearms industry meetings:
- Meeting schedules and attendees

- Discussion topics and outcomes

- Any policy commitments or assurances

- Influence on legislative timeline

  • NZ First positioning on gun legislation:
- Internal strategy documents

- Public statements vs. private positions

- Role in "braking" further restrictions

- Lobbying activities and communications

  • Financial relationships:
- Any donations or payments from firearms industry

- Campaign contributions from gun dealers

- Financial benefits to party or representatives

` LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to ministerial conduct and decision-making EXPECTED OUTCOME: Evidence of political protection racket and industry influence

PRIORITY 2: INTELLIGENCE FAILURES AND GHOST RECORDS

OIA REQUEST 2.1: North Shore Intelligence Files

TO: New Zealand Police Intelligence Unit CC: GCSB, SIS, Australian Federal Police SUBJECT: All intelligence regarding Brenton Tarrant prior to March 15, 2019 REQUESTED INFORMATION: `
  • Australian intelligence sharing:
- All communications from Australian agencies regarding Tarrant

- North Shore (Sydney) threat reports and warnings

- Death threat investigation records (2016 Facebook threat)

- Assessment of Tarrant's extremist activities

  • Domestic intelligence records:
- Any monitoring of Tarrant's online activities

- Intelligence about Bruce Rifle Club activities

- Warnings from Pete Breidahl and other concerned citizens

- Risk assessments and threat level determinations

  • Immigration and border control:
- Tarrant's entry records and visa applications

- Any security screenings or risk assessments

- Decision-making regarding his residency approval

- Communications with Australian authorities

  • "Ghost Record" identification:
- Records that existed but were not acted upon

- Intelligence that was received but suppressed

- Decision logs showing why warnings were ignored

- Internal accountability for intelligence failures

` LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to national security and law enforcement EXPECTED OUTCOME: Proof of "State Silence" and willful blindness to known threats

OIA REQUEST 2.2: Firearms Licensing System Failures

TO: New Zealand Police Firearms Licensing Unit CC: Police National Headquarters, Ministry of Justice SUBJECT: Brenton Tarrant firearms license application and approval process REQUESTED INFORMATION: `
  • Complete license application file:
- Original application forms and references

- Vetting officer notes and assessments

- Decision-making documentation

- Quality control and supervisory reviews

  • Reference verification process:
- Contact attempts with family members

- Substitution of "gaming friends" as references

- Assessment of reference credibility

- Documentation of "good actor" determination

  • System-wide vulnerability assessment:
- MSSA loophole identification and risk assessment

- Internal warnings about regulatory gaps (2017)

- Decisions not to close known loopholes

- Impact assessments of regulatory failures

  • Training and procedures:
- Firearms licensing officer training manuals

- Standard operating procedures for reference checks

- Quality assurance protocols

- Performance metrics and accountability systems

` LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to administrative processes and decision-making EXPECTED OUTCOME: Documentation of Administrative Nullification in licensing system

PRIORITY 3: FINANCIAL FLOWS AND ASSET EXTRACTION

OIA REQUEST 3.1: ACC $40 Million Transfer Investigation

TO: Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) CC: Treasury, Ministry of Health, Police National Headquarters SUBJECT: $40 million contribution to firearms buyback fund REQUESTED INFORMATION: `
  • Decision-making documentation:
- Board meeting minutes approving $40M contribution

- Cost-benefit analysis and economic modeling

- Legal advice on using health funds for law enforcement

- Risk assessments and alternative funding options

  • Economic analysis:
- Full calculation of $1.76 benefit per $1 invested

- Methodology for injury cost reduction projections

- Assumptions and sensitivity analysis

- Peer review and validation of economic models

  • Fund transfer mechanics:
- Treasury approval processes

- Inter-departmental agreements

- Timeline of fund transfers and utilization

- Accounting treatment and financial reporting

  • Alternative funding analysis:
- Treasury budget options that were rejected

- Taxation considerations

- Impact on ACC's core functions

- Long-term financial sustainability implications

` LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to public finance and government expenditure EXPECTED OUTCOME: Evidence of "Robbing Peter to Pay Paul" funding strategy

OIA REQUEST 3.2: Buyback Scheme Financial Architecture

TO: Police National Headquarters CC: Treasury, KPMG, Auditor-General SUBJECT: Firearms buyback scheme financial design and implementation REQUESTED INFORMATION: `
  • Pricing methodology development:
- KPMG consultation contracts and deliverables

- Dealer input on pricing models

- Alternative pricing options considered

- Rationale for 95%/70%/25% condition matrix

  • Cost escalation analysis:
- Original $18M administration cost estimate

- Final $35M actual cost breakdown

- Reasons for cost overruns

- Vendor contracts and procurement processes

  • Dealer compensation framework:
- Wholesale vs. retail pricing decisions

- Stock compensation vs. business loss exclusion

- Impact assessment on dealer profitability

- Comparative analysis with international buybacks

  • Financial audit trails:
- Complete transaction records for all buyback payments

- Verification processes for firearm valuations

- Quality control and fraud prevention measures

- Independent audit findings and recommendations

` LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to public expenditure and financial management EXPECTED OUTCOME: Documentation of wealth transfer from citizens to state and dealers

PRIORITY 4: REGULATORY CAPTURE AND LEGISLATIVE ENGINEERING

OIA REQUEST 4.1: MSSA Loophole Legislative History

TO: Ministry of Justice CC: Police National Headquarters, Parliamentary Counsel Office SUBJECT: MSSA loophole identification and non-closure (2017-2019) REQUESTED INFORMATION: `
  • Loophole identification process:
- Internal police reports identifying MSSA loophole

- Risk assessments and threat analysis

- Recommendations for regulatory changes

- Decision-making timeline and responsibilities

  • Legislative amendment proposals:
- Draft bills and regulatory changes considered

- Cost-benefit analysis of closing loophole

- Industry consultation processes

- Political decision-making documentation

  • Industry lobbying records:
- Gun City and other dealer lobbying activities

- Submissions against regulatory tightening

- Political donations and influence activities

- Meeting records with government officials

  • Regulatory impact assessment:
- Analysis of how loophole enabled Tarrant's actions

- Comparison with international regulatory standards

- Expert opinions and academic research

- Post-Christchurch regulatory reform justification

` LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to legislative development and regulatory decision-making EXPECTED OUTCOME: Evidence of deliberate maintenance of "Target Rich Environment"

OIA REQUEST 4.2: Royal Commission Response and Cover-up

TO: Royal Commission of Inquiry Secretariat CC: Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, Police National Headquarters SUBJECT: Government response to Royal Commission findings and recommendations REQUESTED INFORMATION: `
  • Commission evidence handling:
- Government submissions to the Commission

- Evidence of intelligence failures provided

- Internal assessments of Commission findings

- Strategy for managing Commission recommendations

  • "Lone Wolf" narrative development:
- Government communications about shooter motivation

- Efforts to minimize state responsibility

- Media management strategies

- Public relations campaigns

  • Implementation of recommendations:
- Timeline for implementing Commission recommendations

- Resource allocation for reforms

- Monitoring and accountability mechanisms

- Ongoing compliance reporting

  • Classification and secrecy decisions:
- Information withheld from public release

- National security claims used to suppress evidence

- Decisions about what to include in final report

- Internal debates about transparency vs. security

` LEGAL BASIS: Section 12(1) - Official information relating to government responses to inquiries and public accountability EXPECTED OUTCOME: Documentation of cover-up strategy and narrative management

DEPLOYMENT STRATEGY

PHASE 1: IMMEDIATE DEPLOYMENT (Week 1)

  • Deploy OIA Requests 1.1 and 2.1 (Gun City nexus and intelligence failures)
  • File urgent requests citing public interest and immediate need
  • Request expedited processing due to ongoing investigation

PHASE 2: SYSTEMATIC DEPLOYMENT (Week 2-3)

  • Deploy remaining OIA requests in logical sequence
  • Use initial responses to refine subsequent requests
  • Maintain pressure with follow-up inquiries

PHASE 3: ESCALATION (Week 4+)

  • File complaints for delayed or inadequate responses
  • Consider Ombudsman complaints for non-compliance
  • Prepare legal action for information withholding

LEGAL PREPARATION

  • Prepare judicial review applications for likely refusals
  • Document all correspondence and response times
  • Maintain evidence trail for potential litigation
  • Coordinate with legal team for enforcement actions

EXPECTED OUTCOMES AND IMPACT

PRIMARY EVIDENCE GOALS:

  • State-Dealer Collusion: Documentation of preferential treatment and financial benefits
  • Intelligence Suppression: Proof of ignored warnings and "Ghost Records"
  • Asset Extraction: Evidence of wealth transfer from citizens to state/dealers
  • Regulatory Capture: Documentation of deliberate maintenance of vulnerabilities

STRATEGIC IMPACT:

  • Validation of Christchurch-Jenssen Convergence thesis
  • Foundation for legal action and compensation claims
  • Public exposure of Algorithm of Extraction
  • Disruption of C-O-N operations in firearms domain

PROSECUTION READINESS:

  • Evidence package for potential criminal charges
  • Documentation for civil litigation
  • Foundation for class action lawsuits
  • Support for international investigation requests

CONTINGENCY PLANNING

RESPONSE SCENARIOS:

  • Full Compliance: Immediate deployment of analysis and legal action
  • Partial Compliance: Focused follow-up requests and complaints
  • Complete Refusal: Ombudsman complaints and judicial review applications
  • Delayed Responses: Escalation and media pressure campaigns

ALTERNATIVE EVIDENCE SOURCES:

  • Whistleblower protections and incentives
  • International information sharing agreements
  • Parliamentary question processes
  • Commercial information requests

LEGAL PREPAREDNESS:

  • Pre-drafted judicial review applications
  • Expert witness identification and preparation
  • Media strategy for public interest disclosure
  • Coordination with international investigative bodies

DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATION

OIA PACKAGE STATUS: READY FOR DEPLOYMENT LEGAL REVIEW: COMPLETE STRATEGIC APPROVAL: OBTAINED DEPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION: ACTIVE CLASSIFICATION: RESTRICTED / FORENSIC ANALYSIS / OIA DEPLOYMENT DISTRIBUTION: PROTOCOL 777 INVESTIGATION TEAM NEXT PHASE: IMMEDIATE DEPLOYMENT OF PRIORITY REQUESTS
END OF OIA REQUEST PACKAGE - CHRISTCHURCH-JENSSEN CONVERGENCE INVESTIGATION