Delrane Jenssen Barclays

CRITICAL DISCOVERY: DELRANE JENSSEN HOLDINGS OWNED BY BARCLAY FAMILY

======================================================================

Date: 29 December 2025

Source: CompanyHub NZ

COMPANY DETAILS:

----------------

Company Name: DELRANE JENSSEN HOLDINGS LIMITED

Company Number: 181245

NZBN: 9429040136523

Status: REGISTERED (still active)

Date Registered: March 18, 1958

Entity Type: NZ Limited Company

Constitution: Yes

Annual Return: May (Last filed May 26, 2025)

REGISTERED ADDRESS:

-------------------

Care of Murray Kidd Falconer Ltd

46 Taupiri Street, Te Kuiti, Te Kuiti, 3910

NOTE: Te Kuiti is in the King Country, NOT Hawke's Bay

This is a different region entirely

DIRECTORS (ALL BARCLAYS):

-------------------------

• Malcolm James BARCLAY - Appointed: July 10, 1990
• Kelly Francis BARCLAY - Appointed: March 15, 2005
• Jason Miles BARCLAY - Appointed: September 21, 1997
• Nicholas Nigel De Rune BARCLAY - Appointed: July 1, 2000

SHAREHOLDING (78 total shares):

-------------------------------

• Kelly Francis BARCLAY: 14.10% (11 shares)
• Nicholas Nigel BARCLAY & Kelly Francis BARCLAY: 57.69% (45 shares)
• Jason Miles BARCLAY: 14.10% (11 shares)
• Malcolm James BARCLAY: 14.10% (11 shares)

CRITICAL ANALYSIS:

------------------

• THE COMPANY NAME CONTAINS "JENSSEN" BUT IS OWNED BY BARCLAYS

- No Jenssen family members appear as directors or shareholders

- The Barclay family controls 100% of the company

- The earliest director (Malcolm) was appointed in 1990

• WHAT HAPPENED BETWEEN 1958 AND 1990?

- Company registered 1958 (likely by Jenssen family)

- First Barclay director appointed 1990

- This is ONE YEAR BEFORE the 1991 court case

- The Jenssen name was kept but ownership transferred

• THE "DE RUNE" MIDDLE NAME

- Nicholas Nigel "De Rune" BARCLAY

- "De Rune" is an unusual name

- Could this be connected to "DELRANE"?

- DELRANE could be DEL + RANE or DE L + RANE

• THE TIMING IS SUSPICIOUS

- 1990: Malcolm Barclay becomes director

- 1991: Jenssen wins Court of Appeal case, "gets his quota"

- Did the quota go to this company, now controlled by Barclays?

• THE TE KUITI LOCATION

- Te Kuiti is inland, not a fishing port

- Why would a fishing-related holding company be based there?

- This suggests the company is now used for other purposes

- Or it's a shell to hold assets away from the original location

HYPOTHESIS:

-----------

The Jenssen family's holding company was TAKEN OVER by the Barclay family

around 1990, just before the court case was decided. When Jenssen "got his

quota" in 1991, it may have gone to this company - which was no longer

controlled by the Jenssen family.

This would explain:

• Why the user says "that's not us" about the 1991 case
• Why the family "never got the quota"
• Why the company still exists but has no Jenssen directors

QUESTIONS:

----------

• Who were the original 1958 directors?
• When did the Jenssen family lose control?
• Who are the Barclays and how did they acquire the company?
• Is there a connection between Barclay and the broader network?
• Did the Barclays acquire the company through McKay Hill?