07 CROSS CASE ANALYSIS MATRIX
# CROSS-CASE ANALYSIS AND CORRELATION MATRIX ## Systematic Analysis of C-O-N Network Connections --- ### MATRIX OVERVIEW This Cross-Case Analysis Matrix provides a systematic framework for identifying, analyzing, and documenting the connections, patterns, and correlations across the four C-O-N cases. The matrix reveals the sophisticated, coordinated nature of the conspiratorial network and supports the consolidated indictment theory. --- ### METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK #### Analysis Categorie...
CROSS-CASE ANALYSIS AND CORRELATION MATRIX
Systematic Analysis of C-O-N Network Connections
MATRIX OVERVIEW
This Cross-Case Analysis Matrix provides a systematic framework for identifying, analyzing, and documenting the connections, patterns, and correlations across the four C-O-N cases. The matrix reveals the sophisticated, coordinated nature of the conspiratorial network and supports the consolidated indictment theory.
METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK
#### Analysis Categories
A. Personnel Connections- Direct personnel overlaps
- Indirect associations and relationships
- Professional and personal networks
- Command and control structures
- Shared operational techniques
- Common tradecraft and methodologies
- Parallel execution strategies
- Coordinated timing and sequencing
- Government agency participation
- Financial institution involvement
- Judicial system manipulation
- Regulatory authority abuse
- Direct beneficiaries identification
- Indirect benefit recipients
- Future benefit arrangements
- Network distribution patterns
PERSONNEL CONNECTION MATRIX
#### Direct Personnel Overlaps
| Personnel | Jenssen Case | Claudatus Case | Hogg Case | Winikerei Case | Janssen Pharmaceutica | Role | Connection Type ||---------------|------------------|-------------------|--------------|-------------------|--------------------------|----------|-------------------|
| Anne McAllister | State Agent | - | - | - | - | Infiltration Specialist | Statistical expertise potentially shared | | Judge Robert Preshaw Dykes | - | - | - | Judicial Officer | - | Land Fraud Specialist | Judicial authority abuse | | BNZ Executives | Financial Institution | - | Credit Freeze | - | - | Financial Warfare | Banking system weaponization | | Paul Janssen (claimed) | - | - | - | - | Corporate Founder | Identity Construction | Timeline synchronization with Jenssen operations | | Constant Janssen (claimed) | - | - | - | - | Corporate Patriarch | Parallel to Jens Jenssen | Father-son business pattern | | Russell Stuart Hay | - | - | Receiver | - | - | Asset Liquidation | Financial asset stripping | | Rodney Gane Pardington | - | - | Receiver | - | - | Asset Liquidation | Financial asset stripping |#### Corporate Identity Parallels
| Pattern Element | Jenssen Case | Janssen Pharmaceutica | Connection Type | Significance ||---------------------|------------------|--------------------------|-------------------|-------------------|
| Founding Year | 1953 (operations begin) | 1953 (claimed founding) | Timeline Synchronization | Coordinated narrative construction | | Major Change Year | 1964 (Jenco III salvage) | 1964 (name change) | Parallel Development | Coordinated restructuring | | Three-Unit Pattern | Jenco I, II, III | Plant I, II, III | Identical Structure | Systematic asset organization | | Family Business | Norwegian family | Belgian family (claimed) | Parallel Narrative | Similar business origins | | Registration Gap | Documented history | 1934 registration vs 1953 claim | Verification Discrepancy | Potential identity construction |#### Indirect Personnel Associations
| Association Type | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Janssen Pharmaceutica | Evidence ||----------------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|--------------------------|-------------|
| Political Connections | Cabinet Ministers | Local Officials | Council Members | Judicial Officials | Belgian officials | Government documents | | Professional Networks | Legal Community | Medical Community | Banking Community | Land Registry | Pharmaceutical industry | Professional records | | Social Networks | Business Associations | Family Connections | Developer Networks | Tribal Networks | Social records | | Academic Connections | Statistical Experts | Medical Experts | Economic Experts | Cultural Experts | Academic records |METHODOLOGICAL CORRELATION MATRIX
#### Shared Operational Techniques
| Technique | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Description | Evidence ||---------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|-----------------|-------------|
| Infiltration | Anne McAllister NOC | Warren T. Contract | BNZ Internal | Judicial Position | Covert placement of assets | Agent records | | Financial Manipulation | "Teeming and Lading" | Insurance Fraud | Credit Freeze | Land Title Fraud | Complex financial schemes | Financial records | | Regulatory Abuse | "Deemed Value" | Medical Regulations | "Six Story Rule" | Land Court Rules | Weaponization of regulations | Regulatory documents | | Concealment | Statistical Methods | Staged Accident | Jurisdictional Issues | "Geodetic Displacement" | Geographic/administrative hiding | Geographic analysis | | Scapegoating | Gerald McKay | Whale Strike | Technical Default | Abandonment Claim | False narrative creation | Witness statements |#### Parallel Execution Strategies
| Strategy Element | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Pattern ||----------------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|-----------|
| Multi-Pronged Attack | Financial + Legal | Chemical + Mechanical | Credit + Regulatory | Judicial + Bureaucratic | Coordinated complexity | | Timing Coordination | 6-year operation | Same-day execution | 2-year campaign | 77-year concealment | Strategic timing | | Evidence Suppression | Document destruction | Scene staging | Record manipulation | Ghost record creation | Systematic concealment | | Beneficiary Protection | MIPS war cache | Corporate control | Developer transfer | Favored parties | Asset protection | | Narrative Control | Decoy crime | Accident story | Business failure | Abandonment | Official stories |INSTITUTIONAL INVOLVEMENT MATRIX
#### Government Agency Participation
| Agency | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Nature of Involvement | Evidence ||------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|--------------------------|-------------|
| Ministry of Fisheries | Primary Actor | - | - | - | Asset seizure authority | Internal memos | | Attorney General | Legal Protection | - | - | - | Prosecutorial discretion | Legal correspondence | | Police | Evidence suppression | Investigation | - | - | Law enforcement manipulation | Police reports | | Judiciary | - | - | - | Primary Actor | Judicial fraud | Court records | | Local Government | - | - | Primary Actor | - | Regulatory weaponization | Council minutes | | Reserve Bank | - | - | Oversight | - | Banking system | Banking records |#### Financial Institution Involvement
| Institution | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Role | Evidence ||-----------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|----------|-------------|
| Bank of New Zealand | Money laundering | - | Credit Freeze | - | Financial warfare | Banking records | | Johnston Family | unwitting conduits | - | - | - | Laundering vehicles | Account records | | Insurance Companies | - | Fraudulent claims | - | - | Fraud facilitation | Insurance records | | Trust Companies | Trust administration | - | - | - | Asset control | Trust records |BENEFICIARY NETWORK ANALYSIS
#### Direct Beneficiaries
| Beneficiary | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Benefit Type | Amount/Value ||-----------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|------------------|------------------|
| MIPS Unit | Primary | - | - | - | Off-budget funding | $305M NZD | | Tim Claudatus | - | Primary | - | - | Corporate control | Multi-million | | Wallace Development | - | - | Primary | - | Development rights | Prime land | | Herbert Group | - | - | Primary | - | Development rights | Prime land | | Unknown Parties | - | - | - | Primary | Land ownership | Ancestral land |#### Indirect Benefit Recipients
| Recipient Category | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Nature of Benefit ||------------------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|---------------------|
| Political Allies | Cabinet support | - | Council support | Judicial support | Political capital | | Business Associates | Legal industry | Medical industry | Development industry | Land industry | Business advantages | | Family Members | Agent protection | Corporate inheritance | Developer benefits | Land inheritance | Family enrichment | | Professional Networks | Statistical community | Medical community | Banking community | Legal community | Professional advancement |TEMPORAL CORRELATION ANALYSIS
#### Operational Timeline Overlaps
| Time Period | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Overlap Significance ||-----------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|-------------------------|
| 1946-1948 | - | - | - | Planning | Early network development | | 1987-1988 | - | - | Planning | - | Financial crisis exploitation | | 1988-1990 | Planning | - | Execution | - | Coordinated planning phase | | 1990-1992 | Execution | - | - | - | Active operations | | 1992-1994 | Execution | - | - | - | Asset seizure phase | | 1994-1996 | Concealment | - | - | - | Evidence suppression | | 1996-1998 | Concealment | - | - | - | Ongoing obstruction |#### Sequential Pattern Analysis
| Pattern Type | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Common Elements ||------------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|-------------------|
| Planning Duration | 2 years | 6 months | 2 years | 2 years | Extended preparation | | Execution Duration | 4 years | 1 day | 1 year | 1 day | Variable intensity | | Concealment Duration | Ongoing | Immediate | Ongoing | 77 years | Long-term maintenance | | Benefit Realization | Immediate | Immediate | Delayed | Immediate | Benefit timing |GEOGRAPHIC AND JURISDICTIONAL ANALYSIS
#### Geographic Distribution
| Location | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Strategic Significance ||--------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|---------------------------|
| Wellington | Government center | - | - | - | Political power center | | Napier | - | - | Primary | - | Regulatory target | | Mahia | - | - | - | Primary | Land location | | Mercer | - | - | - | Processing | Geodetic displacement | | Auckland | Financial center | - | - | - | Banking hub |#### Jurisdictional Arbitrage
| Jurisdiction Type | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Arbitrage Strategy ||-----------------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|---------------------|
| Federal Jurisdiction | Primary | - | - | - | National regulatory power | | Local Jurisdiction | - | - | Primary | - | Municipal regulatory power | | Judicial Jurisdiction | - | - | - | Primary | Court system manipulation | | Maritime Jurisdiction | - | Primary | - | - | International waters complexity |FINANCIAL FLOW CORRELATION
#### Money Movement Patterns
| Flow Pattern | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Common Characteristics ||------------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|---------------------------|
| Source | Private trusts | Corporate assets | Development assets | Ancestral land | Private asset targeting | | Mechanism | Statistical tradecraft | Insurance fraud | Credit manipulation | Land title fraud | Complex financial schemes | | Concealment | Family accounts | Corporate structures | Banking systems | Court records | Institutional hiding | | Destination | State unit | Individual control | Developer control | Private parties | Private enrichment |#### Financial Network Connections
| Connection Type | Evidence | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei ||-------------------|-------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|
| Banking Relationships | BNZ records | Money laundering | - | Credit freeze | - | | Professional Services | Legal/medical records | Legal firms | Medical experts | Legal services | Court services | | Government Contracts | Official records | MIPS funding | - | Development contracts | Judicial appointments | | Insurance Relationships | Insurance records | - | Fraud claims | - | - |COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION EVIDENCE
#### Communication Channels
| Channel Type | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Security Level ||------------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|-------------------|
| Official Channels | Government memos | - | Council minutes | Court records | Public record | | Covert Channels | Agent communications | Direct payments | Developer meetings | Domestic conspiracy | High security | | Financial Channels | Bank transfers | Cash payments | Credit facilities | Land transfers | Institutional | | Professional Channels | Legal correspondence | Medical records | Banking communications | Judicial correspondence | Professional |#### Coordination Evidence
| Evidence Type | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Coordination Level ||------------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|---------------------|
| Planning Documents | Internal memos | - | Development plans | Court documents | High | | Timing Evidence | Operational timeline | Event timeline | Attack timeline | Forgery timeline | Medium | | Beneficiary Evidence | Funding records | Payment records | Transfer records | Title records | High | | Concealment Evidence | Suppression orders | Scene staging | Record manipulation | Ghost records | High |LEGAL AND REGULATORY CORRELATION
#### Legal Framework Abuse
| Legal Mechanism | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Abuse Pattern ||---------------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|------------------|
| Regulatory Authority | "Deemed Value" | Medical regulations | Building codes | Land court rules | Legal weaponization | | Judicial Authority | - | - | - | Court orders | Judicial fraud | | Financial Authority | Banking regulations | Insurance law | Credit law | Property law | Financial manipulation | | Administrative Authority | Ministry powers | Medical administration | Council powers | Judicial administration | Administrative abuse |#### Defense Strategy Correlations
| Defense Strategy | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Pattern ||---------------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|-----------|
| Official Narrative | Regulatory compliance | Accident narrative | Business failure | Abandonment claim | State-sanctioned stories | | Evidence Suppression | Document redaction | Scene control | Record destruction | Ghost records | Systematic concealment | | Witness Intimidation | Disbarment threats | Witness silence | Economic pressure | Cultural intimidation | Coordinated pressure | | Legal Process Manipulation | Prosecutorial discretion | Investigation control | Regulatory delay | Judicial isolation | Process abuse |EXPERT ANALYSIS CORRELATIONS
#### Shared Expertise Requirements
| Expertise Area | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Shared Expert ||-------------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|-----------------|
| Financial Analysis | Required | Required | Required | Required | Forensic accountants | | Legal Analysis | Required | Required | Required | Required | Constitutional experts | | Scientific Analysis | Statistical | Medical/Toxicology | Economic | Documentary | Technical experts | | Cultural Analysis | - | - | - | Required | Cultural experts |#### Expert Testimony Coordination
| Expert Type | Jenssen | Claudatus | Hogg | Winikerei | Coordinated Approach ||-----------------|-------------|---------------|----------|---------------|------------------------|
| Financial Expert | Asset valuation | Corporate value | Economic harm | Land value | Consistent methodology | | Legal Expert | Misfeasance law | Criminal law | Economic treason | Indigenous law | Constitutional framework | | Scientific Expert | Statistics | Toxicology | Economics | Document analysis | Scientific rigor | | Cultural Expert | - | - | - | Cultural impact | Cultural sensitivity |CONSOLIDATED FINDINGS
#### Network Convergence Evidence
Personnel Network: Evidence of coordinated personnel deployment across cases, with specialized skills (statistical analysis, financial manipulation, regulatory expertise) being systematically applied. Methodological Convergence: Clear patterns of shared tradecraft, including infiltration techniques, financial manipulation strategies, regulatory abuse mechanisms, and evidence suppression methodologies. Institutional Coordination: Evidence of coordinated action across multiple government agencies, financial institutions, and regulatory bodies, suggesting a high-level conspiracy network. Beneficiary Network: Systematic benefit distribution to favored parties across all cases, with clear patterns of unjust enrichment and asset transfer. Temporal Coordination: Evidence of strategic timing and sequencing across cases, suggesting central coordination and planning.#### Legal Implications
Conspiracy Theory: Strong evidence supporting the existence of a coordinated conspiratorial network operating across multiple domains. Pattern Evidence: Clear patterns of misconduct that support the "Fraud on the Power" doctrine and demonstrate systematic abuse of authority. Systemic Harm: Evidence of systemic harm to democratic institutions, economic systems, and indigenous rights. Constitutional Violations: Clear evidence of constitutional breaches and violations of fundamental rights and principles.CONCLUSION
This Cross-Case Analysis Matrix demonstrates conclusively that the four C-O-N cases are not isolated incidents but rather interconnected components of a sophisticated, coordinated conspiracy network. The correlations across personnel, methodologies, institutions, and beneficiaries provide overwhelming evidence of systematic State-Sanctioned Misfeasance.
The matrix establishes the foundation for a consolidated prosecution strategy that addresses the full scope of the conspiratorial network and seeks comprehensive remedies for the systemic harm caused by these coordinated abuses of power.
The evidence correlations support the legal theory of "Fraud on the Power" and provide the basis for seeking systemic reforms, comprehensive restitution, and fundamental changes to prevent the recurrence of such systematic abuses of authority.