12 ACC COMPENSATION ANALYSIS

--- Source: 12_ACC_COMPENSATION_ANALYSIS.txt ---

ACC COMPENSATION ANALYSIS - "VICTIMS" OF FRAUD

==============================================

Date: 29 December 2025

HYPOTHESIS: Evelyn Evans and Anthony Johnston may have claimed ACC

compensation for "mental injury" as part of playing victim.

================================================================================

ACC MENTAL INJURY COVER - HOW IT WORKS

================================================================================

From ACC policy documents:

ACC covers mental injury caused by:

• Sexual abuse (sensitive claims)
• A covered physical injury
• A work-related traumatic incident
• Being the victim of certain criminal acts (Schedule 3 offences)

KEY POINT: Victims of crime CAN receive ACC compensation for mental injury.

================================================================================

EVELYN EVANS' CLAIM

================================================================================

From court reporting (6 April 2016):

"The stress resulting from McKay's actions had caused her to be admitted

to hospital with health complications."

This statement establishes:

• She claimed STRESS as a result of the fraud
• She was HOSPITALIZED
• She attributed her health issues to McKay's actions

IF SHE FILED AN ACC CLAIM:

• She could receive compensation for mental injury
• She could receive coverage for treatment costs
• She could receive weekly compensation if unable to work

================================================================================

THE FRAUD SCHEME WITHIN THE FRAUD

================================================================================

User's theory: Evans and Johnston were CO-CONSPIRATORS who:

• Participated in the trust fund scheme
• When exposed, positioned themselves as "victims"
• Made dramatic victim impact statements
• Claimed health/stress issues to trigger ACC compensation
• Received ADDITIONAL money through ACC claims

This would be FRAUD UPON FRAUD:

• First fraud: The trust fund theft scheme
• Second fraud: False ACC claims for "mental injury"

================================================================================

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE THEORY

================================================================================

• EVELYN EVANS

- Emphasized being McKay's "friend" (insider knowledge)

- Claimed hospitalization from stress (ACC trigger)

- Made dramatic victim impact statement (performance)

- Lost "nearly $500,000" (large amount = large claim)

• ANTHONY JOHNSTON

- Still "waiting" for $90,000 in 2016 (ongoing relationship)

- Geographic connection to network (Georges Drive, Ahuriri)

- Maritime/sailing club connection (fishing industry)

- Made statements to media (public victim performance)

• PATTERN

- Multiple "victims" with similar dramatic statements

- All emphasizing emotional/health impact

- All maintaining ongoing claims for money

================================================================================

ACC CLAIM PROCESS

================================================================================

To claim mental injury from crime victimization:

• Report the crime to police
• Obtain diagnosis from mental health professional
• Submit ACC claim form (ACC45)
• Provide medical certificate (ACC18)
• Submit mental injury report (ACC5774)

The "victims" would have had to:

• Report to police (done - McKay was prosecuted)
• Get diagnosed with mental injury (stress, PTSD, etc.)
• Submit claims to ACC
• Receive ongoing compensation

================================================================================

INVESTIGATION QUESTIONS

================================================================================

• Did Evelyn Evans file an ACC claim for mental injury?
• Did Anthony Johnston file an ACC claim?
• What was the total ACC payout to "victims"?
• Were the mental injury diagnoses legitimate?
• Did the "victims" receive weekly compensation?
• Are there other "victims" who also claimed ACC?

================================================================================

OIA REQUEST RECOMMENDED

================================================================================

ACC does not disclose individual claim information, but an OIA could request:

• Aggregate data on claims related to McKay case
• Number of mental injury claims citing the McKay fraud
• Total compensation paid to victims of the McKay case

Note: Individual claim details are protected by privacy laws.

================================================================================

THE DOUBLE-DIP SCHEME

================================================================================

If the theory is correct, the scheme worked as follows:

PHASE 1: TRUST FUND OPERATION

• Money moved through trust accounts
• "Victims" were actually participants
• Funds distributed among conspirators

PHASE 2: EXPOSURE AND PIVOT

• Law Society audit exposed the deficit
• Conspirators pivot to "victim" role
• McKay takes the fall (or is the designated fall guy)

PHASE 3: VICTIM COMPENSATION

• File victim impact statements
• Claim stress/health issues
• File ACC claims for mental injury
• Receive compensation as "victims"

PHASE 4: ONGOING CLAIMS

• Continue claiming money is owed
• Maintain victim status
• Potentially receive ongoing ACC payments

This would explain why:

• The victim statements were so dramatic
• The health claims were emphasized
• The "victims" maintained public profiles
• The amounts "stolen" were so precisely known