Investigation Report

COMPREHENSIVE CROSSREF ANALYSIS

--- Source: COMPREHENSIVE_CROSSREF_ANALYSIS.txt --- # Comprehensive Cross-Reference Analysis ## All Networks, Trusts, Lawyers, and Accountants **Date:** December 28, 2025 --- ## MASTER ENTITY REGISTRY ### Law Firms Identified | Firm | Location | Key Personnel | Connected To | |------|----------|---------------|--------------| | **Langley Twigg** | Napier | Peter Twigg, Deborah Twigg | NIT Network, Māori Land Law, Gaming Law | | **Oldershaw Accountants** | Napier | Maria Munoz | PAMT, NI...

1 source files18.9 KB

--- Source: COMPREHENSIVE_CROSSREF_ANALYSIS.txt ---

Comprehensive Cross-Reference Analysis

All Networks, Trusts, Lawyers, and Accountants

Date: December 28, 2025

MASTER ENTITY REGISTRY

Law Firms Identified

| Firm | Location | Key Personnel | Connected To |

|------|----------|---------------|--------------|

| Langley Twigg | Napier | Peter Twigg, Deborah Twigg | NIT Network, Māori Land Law, Gaming Law | | Oldershaw Accountants | Napier | Maria Munoz | PAMT, NIT Network | | Norris Ward McKinnon | Hamilton | Martin Bradley | Grassroots Trust, HB Property Enterprises | | Don Kennedy Solicitors | Hastings | Peter Dennehy (deceased) | Infinity Foundation | | Hesketh Henry | Auckland | - | OmniHealth | | Willis Legal | Napier | Kevin Callinicos | Hawke's Bay Foundation |

Accounting Firms Identified

| Firm | Location | Key Personnel | Connected To |

|------|----------|---------------|--------------|

| Oldershaw | Napier | Maria Munoz | PAMT, NIT Network | | Audit Hawke's Bay | Hastings | Graeme Harvey | Grassroots Trust Central | | Mike Knobloch (CA) | Hawke's Bay | Mike Knobloch | Grassroots Trust Central (Director) |

Gaming Trusts Identified

| Trust | Key Personnel | Auditor/Accountant | Lawyer |

|-------|---------------|-------------------|--------|

| Grassroots Trust Limited | Martin Bradley (Chair), Kevin Burgess | Unknown | Norris Ward McKinnon | | Grassroots Trust Central | Sean Hannan (Chair), Mike Knobloch, Martin Bradley, Kath Grieve | Audit Hawke's Bay | Norris Ward McKinnon | | Infinity Foundation | Peter Dennehy, Blair Furlong | Unknown | Don Kennedy Solicitors | | First Light Foundation | Various | Unknown | Unknown |

CROSS-REFERENCE MATRIX

Connection 1: Norris Ward McKinnon ↔ Hawke's Bay

| Finding | Evidence |

|---------|----------|

| Receivership of HB company | Hawkes Bay Property Enterprises Limited |

| Case law connection | Cited in Hawke's Bay Trustee Company case |

| Gaming trust director | Martin Bradley (Grassroots Trust) |

Connection 2: Grassroots Trust ↔ Hawke's Bay

| Finding | Evidence |

|---------|----------|

| Hawke's Bay director | Kath Grieve (HB business consultant) |

| Hawke's Bay accountant | Mike Knobloch (CA, Grassroots Director) |

| Hawke's Bay auditor | Audit Hawke's Bay (Hastings) |

| Merged with Infinity | Infinity Foundation (Hastings-based) |

Connection 3: Infinity Foundation ↔ Hastings Legal Network

| Finding | Evidence |

|---------|----------|

| Trustee was Hastings lawyer | Peter Dennehy (Don Kennedy Solicitors) |

| Trustee was Coroner | Peter Dennehy (Coroner 1988-2008) |

| Fraud confirmed | $320,357 improper grants (2011-2012) |

| Merged into Grassroots | Infinity Foundation merged with Grassroots Trust |

Connection 4: Langley Twigg ↔ Gaming/Charity Sector

| Finding | Evidence |

|---------|----------|

| Gaming law practice | Listed as gaming lawyers in Napier |

| Charity law practice | Nonprofit & Charitable Organizations |

| Trustee roles | Peter Twigg - Sailability Trust, Rowing NZ |

| 1998 charity agent | NZ Gazette notice |

Connection 5: Oldershaw ↔ PAMT ↔ NIT Network

| Finding | Evidence |

|---------|----------|

| PAMT contact email | [email protected] |

| NIT company addresses | Multiple NIT companies at Oldershaw address |

| Financial services | Audits, accounting for charities |


GEOGRAPHIC OVERLAP ANALYSIS

Hastings/Napier Cluster

| Entity | Type | Location |

|--------|------|----------|

| Langley Twigg | Law Firm | Napier |

| Oldershaw | Accountants | Napier |

| PAMT | Charity | Napier |

| NIT Network | Companies | Napier |

| Don Kennedy Solicitors | Law Firm | Hastings |

| Infinity Foundation | Gaming Trust | Hastings |

| Audit Hawke's Bay | Accountants | Hastings |

| Central Medical | Medical | Napier |

| OmniHealth practices | Medical | Napier/Hastings |

Hamilton Cluster

| Entity | Type | Location |

|--------|------|----------|

| Norris Ward McKinnon | Law Firm | Hamilton |

| Grassroots Trust | Gaming Trust | Hamilton |

| Grassroots Trust Central | Gaming Trust | Hamilton |

| Maxserv Limited | Company Services | Hamilton |


POTENTIAL FUNDS FLOW MODEL

Based on the investigation findings, a potential funds flow model emerges:

`

Gaming Revenue (Pokies)

Gaming Trusts (Grassroots, Infinity, First Light)

Professional Gatekeepers

├── Lawyers (Langley Twigg, Norris Ward McKinnon, Don Kennedy)

├── Accountants (Oldershaw, Audit HB, Mike Knobloch)

└── Trustees (Peter Dennehy, Martin Bradley, Blair Furlong)

Charities/Trusts

├── PAMT ($717,126 "Other Expenses" in 2022)

├── NIT Network entities

└── Other controlled entities

Ultimate Beneficiaries (Unknown)

`

KEY FINDINGS SUMMARY

Confirmed Connections

  • Martin Bradley is both a lawyer at Norris Ward McKinnon AND Chairman of Grassroots Trust - creating a lawyer-gaming trust overlap
  • Peter Dennehy was both a Coroner AND Infinity Foundation trustee - creating a death/estate-gaming trust overlap
  • Grassroots Trust Central uses Audit Hawke's Bay (Hastings) as auditor - connecting Hamilton gaming trust to Hawke's Bay accounting
  • Mike Knobloch is both a Chartered Accountant AND Director of Grassroots Trust Central - creating an accountant-gaming trust overlap
  • Infinity Foundation (Hastings) merged into Grassroots Trust (Hamilton) after the fraud was discovered - potentially moving assets/operations
  • Norris Ward McKinnon handled receivership of Hawkes Bay Property Enterprises - connecting Hamilton law firm to Hawke's Bay business failures

Unconfirmed But Suspected

  • Langley Twigg may have worked with Grassroots Trust or other gaming trusts
  • Oldershaw may audit gaming trusts or their grant recipients
  • PAMT may receive grants from gaming trusts
  • NIT Network companies may receive grants from gaming trusts

QUESTIONS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION

  • Does PAMT receive any grants from gaming trusts?
  • Do any NIT Network companies receive gaming trust grants?
  • Did Langley Twigg ever work with Infinity Foundation or Grassroots Trust?
  • Did Oldershaw ever audit Infinity Foundation or Grassroots Trust?
  • Who received the $320,357 in improper grants from Infinity Foundation?
  • What happened to Infinity Foundation's assets when it merged with Grassroots?
  • Is there any connection between the 2024 gaming corruption defendants and the investigation entities?

--- Source: COMPREHENSIVE_CASE_ANALYSIS.txt ---

PROTOCOL 777: COMPREHENSIVE CASE ANALYSIS

The 77-Year Administrative Nullification Network


DOCUMENT CONTROL

  • Analysis Reference: P777-1947-2025-COMPREHENSIVE
  • Version: 4.0 (Network Analysis Complete)
  • Date: December 7, 2025
  • Classification: TOP SECRET - COMPLETE NETWORK ANALYSIS
  • Status: READY FOR INTERNATIONAL PROCEEDINGS
  • Scope: Cross-Domain State-Sanctioned Asset Stripping

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Protocol 777 Network: 77 Years of Systemic State Corruption

The Protocol 777 investigation reveals a comprehensive 77-year criminal enterprise spanning three domains (Land, Maritime, Property) and utilizing increasingly aggressive methods of administrative nullification. This network represents the most systematic example of state-sanctioned asset stripping in New Zealand history.

The Three-Phase Evolution:
  • Phase 1 (1947): Administrative fraud through judicial manipulation
  • Phase 2 (1987): Industrial homicide and regulatory weaponization
  • Phase 3 (1993): Evidence fabrication and civil forfeiture
The Universal Algorithm: The same "Algorithm of Theft" deployed across all three cases, demonstrating a consistent methodology of state asset acquisition through illegal means.

I. THE PAPA MAHIA MERCER TRIANGLE: FOUNDATIONAL FRAUD

A. Geographic Blueprint of Administrative Nullification

#### The Triangle Structure `mermaid

graph TD

A[PAPA - The Ancestor] --> B[Identity Weaponization]

C[MAHIA - The Land] --> D[Sacred Asset Target]

E[MERCER - The Fraud] --> F[Administrative Weapon]

B --> G[Geodetic Displacement]

D --> H[Protective Custody]

F --> I[Ghost Record Creation]

G --> J[Land Title Severance]

H --> K[77-Year Preservation]

I --> L[Asset Transfer Mechanism]

` #### Key Personnel Analysis | Actor | Role | Method | Outcome |

|-----------|----------|------------|------------|

| Judge R.P. Dykes | Judicial architect | Venue shopping, holiday sessions | Created precedent for jurisdiction abuse | | Rogue Clerk (GAP-PW-01) | Physical implementer | Handwriting manipulation | Executed geodetic displacement | | Isobel Creswell | Protective custodian | Private title preservation | Preserved land for 77 years |

B. The Administrative Innovation

#### Geodetic Displacement: The 300km Crime
  • True Location: Mahia/Wairoa (East Coast)
  • Fraudulent Location: Mercer (Waikato - 300km west)
  • Method: Administrative jurisdiction manipulation
  • Purpose: Disconnect ancestor from true land interests
  • Result: "Ghost Record" enabling land title severance
#### The Holiday Window Exploitation
  • Date: January 31, 1947 (Summer judicial recess)
  • Court Status: "Shadow Session" with minimal oversight
  • Advantage: Perfect conditions for administrative fraud
  • Legacy: Established template for future exploitation

II. THE DEEP SEA FISHERIES ESCALATION: INDUSTRIAL HOMICIDE

A. From Passive to Active Asset Acquisition

#### The Strategic Evolution `mermaid

graph LR

A[Administrative Fraud] --> B[Regulatory Weaponization]

B --> C[Physical Sabotage]

C --> D[Industrial Homicide]

D --> E[Asset Seizure]

` #### The "Weld of Death" Sabotage
  • Victim: F.V. Deep Sea II fishing vessel
  • Method: Unauthorized hydraulic winch welding
  • Effect: Fatal stability compromise
  • Casualties: 3 deaths (Svein Kristensen, Bede Parker, Stu Hamilton)
  • Purpose: Eliminate resistance to quota seizure

B. The Deemed Value Financial Weapon

#### Administrative Fraud Mechanism | Component | Function | Effect |

|---------------|--------------|-----------|

| Deemed Value Penalties | Financial weaponization | Engineered insolvency | | Permit Suspension | Revenue prevention | Asset freeze | | Forced Liquidation | Asset seizure mechanism | Quota transfer to Crown | | Sealord Settlement | Political objective | Treaty funding with stolen assets | #### The Norwegian Connection: Vulnerability Exploitation
  • Background: Soviet espionage involvement (1985-1986)
  • Migration: Defector status to New Zealand
  • Vulnerability: Political blackmail potential
  • Targeting: Perfect victim for state asset seizure

III. THE SHAUN ALLEN EVOLUTION: EVIDENCE FABRICATION

A. The Third Phase: Direct Police Corruption

#### Evidence Fabrication Network `mermaid

graph TD

A[Detective Lawrence De Luca] --> B[Evidence Manufacturing]

C[Detective Milton Weir] --> D[Evidence Planting]

E[Crown Law Office] --> F[Prosecutorial Misconduct]

B --> G[Fabricated MODA Report]

D --> H[Pre-existing Cultivation]

F --> I[Wrongful Conviction]

G --> J[Illegal Search Justification]

H --> K[False Crime Scene]

I --> L[Civil Forfeiture]

` #### The Fabrication Protocol
  • Illegal Search: Wrong name warrant (Shaun Campbell vs Shaun Allen)
  • No Photographic Evidence: Zero photos of 1,038 alleged plants
  • Disappearing Notebook: Multiple inks, removed pages, final disappearance
  • Fake MODA Report: Non-existent computer terminal "HAPWAB"
  • Withheld Evidence: Suppressed video of pre-existing cultivation

B. The Civil Forfeiture Innovation

#### Asset Seizure Mechanism
  • Property: 340-hectare Esk Valley farm
  • Value: $365,000 (1994) vs $150,000 purchase (1992)
  • Method: First use of Proceeds of Crime Act for real estate
  • Legal Basis: Entirely dependent on wrongful conviction
  • Outcome: Precedent for property forfeiture through fabricated conviction

IV. THE UNIVERSAL ALGORITHM OF THEFT

A. Cross-Domain Pattern Analysis

#### The Universal Methodology `mermaid

graph TD

A[Identify Valuable Asset] --> B[Create Administrative Complexity]

B --> C[Exploit System Vulnerability]

C --> D[Execute Legal Fiction]

D --> E[Force Asset Surrender]

E --> F[Transfer to State/Proxy]

` #### Domain-Specific Implementation | Domain | Asset Type | Method | Legal Tool | Outcome |

|------------|---------------|------------|---------------|------------|

| Land (1947) | Māori land title | Geodetic displacement | Judicial manipulation | Transfer to Creswell | | Maritime (1987) | Fishing quota | Industrial homicide | Regulatory weaponization | Transfer to Crown | | Property (1993) | Real estate | Evidence fabrication | Police misconduct | Forfeiture to Crown |

B. The Network Personnel Connections

#### Cross-Case Personnel Analysis
  • Milton Weir: Evidence planting in both Bain and Allen cases
  • Police Culture: Systemic tolerance for evidence fabrication
  • Prosecutorial Complicity: Pattern of overlooking police misconduct
  • Judicial Acceptance: Courts enabling miscarriage of justice

V. THE FINANCIAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. Total Asset Value Seized

#### Quantified Losses | Case | Asset Type | Original Value | Current Value | Total Loss |

|----------|---------------|-------------------|------------------|---------------|

| Papa Winikerei | Mahia coastal land | $50,000 (1947) | $15M (2025) | $15M + opportunity | | Deep Sea Fisheries | Fishing quota | $120M (1987) | $305M (2025) | $305M claim | | Shaun Allen | 340-hectare farm | $150K (1992) | $365K (1994) | $365K + 30 years | #### Total Network Impact
  • Direct Asset Seizure: $320.365 million
  • Lost Opportunity Cost: $500 million+ (compound interest)
  • Human Cost: 3 deaths, 30-year imprisonment, family destruction
  • Systemic Cost: Erosion of rule of law and judicial integrity

B. The Treaty Settlement Connection

#### The "Fruit of the Poisonous Tree" Doctrine `mermaid

graph TD

A[Stolen Assets] --> B[Sealord Settlement Funding]

B --> C[Treaty Settlements]

C --> D[Settlement Economy]

D --> E[Crisis of Finality]

` #### Constitutional Crisis Implications
  • Tainted Currency: Settlements funded with stolen assets
  • Systemic Fraud: Same algorithm across multiple domains
  • Unpaid Debts: Stolen assets mean settlements not final
  • Zombie Claims: All settlements vulnerable to reopening

VI. THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR INTERNATIONAL PROCEEDINGS

A. State Responsibility Claims

#### International Law Violations
  • ICCPR Article 26: Systemic discrimination against targeted groups
  • ICCPR Article 17: Arbitrary interference with family and home
  • UNDRIP Articles: Violation of indigenous property rights
  • Customary International Law: State responsibility for systematic theft
#### Evidence Framework for International Action
  • Documentary Proof: Complete paper trail across all three cases
  • Pattern Evidence: 77-year consistent methodology
  • Geographic Evidence: Cross-domain asset stripping
  • Personnel Evidence: Network connections and conspiracies

B. Domestic Legal Remedies

#### Comprehensive Legal Strategy
  • Constitutional Claims: BORA violations across all cases
  • Civil Restitution: Full asset recovery with compound interest
  • Criminal Prosecutions: Police and judicial misconduct
  • Systemic Reform: Structural changes to prevent recurrence

VII. STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP

Phase 1: Evidence Consolidation (Weeks 1-4)

  • Priority Actions:
- Secure all original documentary evidence

- Obtain expert forensic analysis across all cases

- Compile network personnel connections

- Prepare comprehensive evidence dossiers

Phase 2: International Proceedings (Weeks 5-8)

  • International Actions:
- File UN Human Rights Committee complaints

- Initiate UN Permanent Forum indigenous rights claims

- Prepare International Court state responsibility case

- Coordinate Commonwealth judicial corruption complaints

Phase 3: Domestic Resolution (Weeks 9-12)

  • Domestic Actions:
- File High Court constitutional claims

- Initiate criminal proceedings against network personnel

- Demand Royal Commission into systemic misconduct

- Begin public awareness and media campaign


VIII. THE CRISIS OF FINALITY: CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS

A. The Existential Threat to Treaty Framework

#### The Settlement Legitimacy Crisis
  • Tainted Foundation: Settlements funded with stolen assets
  • Systemic Fraud: Same algorithm used across multiple domains
  • Legal Invalidity: "Fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine
  • Political Consequences: Potential invalidation of entire framework

B. The Strategic Ultimatum

#### Option A: Controlled Rectification
  • Crown Admission: Acknowledge specific administrative glitches
  • Full Restitution: Complete asset recovery with compound interest
  • Systemic Reform: Structural changes to administrative processes
  • Framework Preservation: Maintain Treaty settlement integrity
#### Option B: Constitutional Collapse
  • Public Revelation: Complete exposure of 77-year network
  • Treaty Challenges: Legal challenges to all settlements
  • System Collapse: Potential constitutional crisis
  • International Condemnation: Global reputational damage

IX. CONCLUSION: THE IMPERATIVE FOR JUSTICE

The Network Analysis Summary

The Protocol 777 investigation reveals a comprehensive 77-year criminal enterprise that evolved from administrative fraud to industrial homicide to evidence fabrication. The network demonstrates:

Key Findings:
  • Systematic Pattern: Consistent algorithm across three domains
  • Escalating Violence: Increasing state aggression over time
  • Network Connections: Cross-case personnel and methodological links
  • Financial Impact: $320M+ in direct asset seizure
  • Constitutional Crisis: Threat to entire Treaty settlement framework
Legal Strengths:
  • Documented Evidence: Complete paper trail across all cases
  • Pattern Recognition: Clear methodology identification
  • Network Analysis: Comprehensive personnel mapping
  • International Law: Clear violations of multiple conventions
The Time for Accountability Has Arrived.
Document Control Information:
  • Prepared by: Protocol 777 Comprehensive Analysis Team
  • Status: READY FOR INTERNATIONAL AND DOMESTIC PROCEEDINGS
  • Classification: TOP SECRET - COMPLETE NETWORK ANALYSIS
  • Next Action: Immediate filing of international human rights complaints

"Whiti te rā. The sun shines on truth and justice."